English in Great Britain since 1700: Porovnání verzí
(Založena nová stránka s textem „=== 2. Comment on the history of English spelling reforms. What and how were they trying to accomplish. What were their results === - Spelling conventions…“) |
Značka: editace z Vizuálního editoru |
||
Řádek 7: | Řádek 7: | ||
- Variety of movements which wanted to change English ortography: | - Variety of movements which wanted to change English ortography: | ||
- wanted the one-to-one relationship between phoneme and letters in the alphabet | - wanted the one-to-one relationship between phoneme and letters in the alphabet | ||
− | - alphabetic principle was more or less maintained (except for Pitman shorthand and Lodwick's Universal | + | - alphabetic principle was more or less maintained (except for Pitman shorthand and Lodwick's Universal Alphabet) |
- "New Spelling" by Simplified Spelling Society of Great Britain: | - "New Spelling" by Simplified Spelling Society of Great Britain: | ||
- <k> for /k/ sounds in all instances --> ''kanot, konsekraet, detrakt'' | - <k> for /k/ sounds in all instances --> ''kanot, konsekraet, detrakt'' |
Verze z 18. 4. 2015, 20:30
2. Comment on the history of English spelling reforms. What and how were they trying to accomplish. What were their results
- Spelling conventions of ModE different from EModE - The accepted changes were the following: - Lower case letters for all but proper nouns, adjectives and verbs (Britain, Welsh, Anglicize) - The “long” <ɾ> as in “ɾpeech” disappeared - The <k> at the ends of words like Teutonick disappeared too - Variety of movements which wanted to change English ortography: - wanted the one-to-one relationship between phoneme and letters in the alphabet - alphabetic principle was more or less maintained (except for Pitman shorthand and Lodwick's Universal Alphabet) - "New Spelling" by Simplified Spelling Society of Great Britain: - <k> for /k/ sounds in all instances --> kanot, konsekraet, detrakt - /ð/ is spelled as <dh> as in dhis - final <e> is dropped in words such as sens - StE spelling gives preference to etymological spellings --> causes inter-linguistic intelligibility - Scots spelling is similar to StE spelling but there are some Scottish conventions such as <ui> for fronted /(j)y/