Sound Change: Porovnání verzí

(Vysvětlení pojmů diphthongisation a monophthongisation.)
m
Řádek 103: Řádek 103:
 
'''Diphthongisation'''
 
'''Diphthongisation'''
  
- change in which an original single vowel changes into a sequence of two vowel segments which together occupy the nucleus of a single syllable
+
- a change in which an original single vowel changes into a sequence of two vowel segments which together occupy the nucleus of a single syllable
  
 
- examples from English: /mis/ > /mais/ 'mice', /mus/ > /maus/ 'mouse'. We see that the original long high vowels /i/ and /u/ became /ai/ and /au/ respectively.
 
- examples from English: /mis/ > /mais/ 'mice', /mus/ > /maus/ 'mouse'. We see that the original long high vowels /i/ and /u/ became /ai/ and /au/ respectively.
Řádek 109: Řádek 109:
 
'''Monophthongisation'''
 
'''Monophthongisation'''
  
- the opposite of diphthongisation: a former diphthong changes into a single vowel.
+
- the opposite of diphthongisation: a former diphthong changes into a single vowel  
  
 
- an example from Spanish: tauru > toro 'bull'   
 
- an example from Spanish: tauru > toro 'bull'   

Verze z 29. 4. 2015, 11:10

1. Explain the so‐called regularity principle (“Neogrammarian hypothesis”).

-the Neogrammarians (beginning in about 1876, Germany)

- a group of younger scholars who antagonised the leaders of the field at that time by attacking older thinking and loudly proclaiming their own views

- the early Neogrammarians included Karl Brugmann, Berthold Delbriick, August Leskien, Hermann Osthoff, Hermann Paul etc.

-their slogan: sound laws suffer no exceptions → the assumption that sound chage is regular = the change takes place whenever the sound or sounds which undergo the change are found in the circumstances or environments that condition the change

Ex. In Spanish, p->b when intervocalic (no exceptions - sound change is not arbitrary)

- the regular sound changes are of high significance in historical linguistics - they are extremely important to the methods and theories about language change

2. Explain the difference between the following sound changes:

Sporadic / Regular

Sporadic = affects only a few words, not the entire language; the change is unpredictable.

Ex. OE spræc => PDE speech. Loss of r is not general – spring, spree etc. retain it

Regular = apply throughout language; are predictable

Ex. In Spanish, p changes into b when intervocalic

Conditioned/Unconditioned

Conditioned sound change = dependent on certain contexts and affects only some of the sound’s occurrences.

Ex. In Spanish, p changes into b when intervocalic

Unconditioned sound change = occurs generally and is not dependent on the phonetic context or restricted by neighbouring sounds

Ex. P at the beginning of words = p.

Phonemic/phonological and Non‐phonemic/phonetic

Non-phonemic (allophonic change) do not alter the total number of phonemes in the language => non-phonemic shift = change in pronunciation (phonetic level), but no changes in phonemic level.

Phonemic = change the structural organization of the inventory of sounds – adds/deletes phonemes/basic sounds in the langauge

4. Explain the following concepts:

Assimilation

- one sound becomes more similar to another --> the influence of a neighbouring, usually adjacent, sound

- dichotomies: total-partial, contact-distant, regressive-progressive

- total - the soundbecomes identical to another by taking on all of its phonetic features

- partial - the assimilating sound acquires some traits of another, but does not become fully identical to it

-regressive - the sound that undergoes the change comes earlier in the word (more to the left) than the sound which causes or conditions the assimilation

- progressive - affects the sounds which come later in the word than the conditioning environment

contact - the sounds are immediately adjacent

distant - non-adjacent

a) total contact regressive assimilation: Latin octo > Italian otto (eight), noctem > notte (night)

b) total contact progressive assimilation: PIE *kolnis > Latin collis (hill); PG *hulnis > OE hyll > ModE hill; OE myln > ModE mill

c) partial contact regressive assimilation

d) partial contact progressive assimilation

e) distant assimilation

Chain shift

- interconnected changes with far-reaching impact on the overall phonological system of the language

- often attributed to notions such as "symmetry in phonemic inventories", "naturalness", "markedness", "maximum differentiation", "a tendency for holes in phonological patterns to be filled"

the general idea: sound systems tend to be symmetrical or natural, and those that are not (with gaps in the inventory(, tend to change to make them symmetrical or natural (to fill the gap) --> a change which fills one gap may create other gaps elsewhere in the system -> other changes towards symmetry

- 2 types: pull chains x push chains

- a pull chain: one change may create a hole in the phonemic pattern which is followed by another change which fills the hole by "pulling" some sounds from somewhere else in the system and changing that sound to fit the needs of symmetry --> the sound which shifted to fill the original hole in the patterns leaves a new hole elsewhere in the pattern --> some other change may "pull" some other sounds to fill that gap

- a push chain: notion that languages (or their speakers) want to maintain difference between sounds in the system in order to facilitate understanding, the processing of what is heard. A sound starts changing by moving into the articulatory space of another sounds --> change where the sound moves away from the encroaching one in order to maintain distinctions important to meaning --> if the sound is pushed towards articulatory space of some other sound, then it may shift to avoid the encroachment

Apocope (tata > tat)

- loss of a sound, usually a vowel, at the end of a word

- OE vs PDE nouns sticca> stick, sunu > son, mona > moon

Syncope (atata > atta)

- the loss of a vowel from interior of a word

- in many varieties of English = fam(i)ly, mem(o)ry

- Vulgar Latin > Western Romance languages = the unstressed vowels other than a lost in the interior of words three syllables long or longer (pópulu > poplV-, French peuple, English people)

5. Explain the following concepts: monophthongisation and diphthongisation; compensatory lengthening; metathesis; breaking.

Diphthongisation

- a change in which an original single vowel changes into a sequence of two vowel segments which together occupy the nucleus of a single syllable

- examples from English: /mis/ > /mais/ 'mice', /mus/ > /maus/ 'mouse'. We see that the original long high vowels /i/ and /u/ became /ai/ and /au/ respectively.

Monophthongisation

- the opposite of diphthongisation: a former diphthong changes into a single vowel

- an example from Spanish: tauru > toro 'bull'

Compensatory lengthening

Metathesis

Breaking